Modvat credit on returned defective goods may be allowed when reprocessed into the same kind of goods.

Returned defective goods cleared on duty and taken back for reprocessing to make goods of the same kind free from defects could be treated as inputs for Modvat credit purposes. Credit was therefore admissible where the goods were returned because they failed to meet buyers' specifications. Denial of credit could not be sustained on grounds not stated in the notice, and the possibility that the process might also fit another provision did not justify refusing the benefit otherwise available under the applicable provision.

---

---

Issues: Whether Modvat credit was admissible on defective goods returned by customers for reprocessing as inputs, and whether denial of credit could be sustained on grounds not stated in the notice.

Analysis: The goods had been cleared on payment of duty and were returned because they did not meet buyers' specifications. The Tribunal held that such returned defective goods, when taken back for reprocessing to produce goods of the same kind free from defects, can be treated as inputs for the purpose of credit. It also noted that the grounds adopted in the adjudication order were not those alleged in the notice. The argument that the process might also fall within other provisions was not accepted as a basis to deny credit, because the assessee could choose the benefit available under the provision applicable to its case, and the availability of another route did not justify denial of the credit otherwise admissible.

Conclusion: Credit was admissible and the denial could not be sustained.

---