TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether grinding wheel was eligible for Modvat credit as an input under Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. (ii) Whether ceramic grinding media in the form of balls was eligible for Modvat credit as an input under Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.
Issue (i): Whether grinding wheel was eligible for Modvat credit as an input under Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.
Analysis: The dispute turned on whether the grinding wheel was an input used in or in relation to the manufacture of the final product, or merely a tool or part of machinery. The applicable principle was the wider meaning of the expression "used in or in relation to the manufacture", but a distinction was drawn between eligible inputs and parts of machinery or tools excluded from the definition. The reasoning followed the view that the grinding wheel, on the facts, was not a mere tool or equipment but was used in the manufacturing process in relation to the final product.
Conclusion: The grinding wheel was held to be eligible for Modvat credit, in favour of the assessee.
Issue (ii): Whether ceramic grinding media in the form of balls was eligible for Modvat credit as an input under Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.
Analysis: The question was whether the grinding media, when used with frit in the ball mill, constituted an input consumed in the manufacturing process. The reasoning accepted that the steel or ceramic balls came into contact with the material, were consumed in the process, and were used in relation to manufacture, bringing them within the scope of admissible Modvat credit on the basis of the wider statutory expression and the cited precedent on similar grinding media.
Conclusion: The ceramic grinding media was held to be eligible for Modvat credit, in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The disallowance of Modvat credit was set aside and the assessee succeeded on both disputed items.
Ratio Decidendi: An article used in the manufacturing process is admissible as Modvat input if it is consumed or operates directly in relation to manufacture, but an item is excluded only where it is properly characterised as a part of machinery or a mere tool unrelated to that statutory test.
TaxTMI 
