Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to exemption under Notification No. 175/86-C.E. after shifting its factory to a new premises while the registration certificate continued to show the old address, and whether absence of a Central Excise licence disentitled it to the exemption.
Analysis: The exemption notification was intended for a small scale industry and did not make holding of a Central Excise licence a condition for availing the benefit. Any default in obtaining such licence could attract action under the relevant law, but it did not by itself affect eligibility under the notification. The benefit of the notification attached to the manufacturer and not to a particular address. Since the assessee had applied for correction of the registration particulars and the change of address was subsequently incorporated by the competent authority, the shifting of the factory did not defeat the exemption claim.
Conclusion: The assessee remained entitled to the exemption and the denial of benefit was unjustified.
Ratio Decidendi: Exemption under Notification No. 175/86-C.E. cannot be denied merely because the factory shifted premises or because a Central Excise licence was not obtained, so long as the statutory conditions for small scale exemption are otherwise satisfied and the registration particulars are duly corrected.