Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the penalty equivalent to wrongly taken Modvat credit could be sustained for a period prior to the introduction of Rule 57U(5), and what would be the proper quantum of penalty in the facts and circumstances.
Analysis: The credit was admittedly taken during October 1995 to January 1996, whereas Rule 57U(5), prescribing a statutory penalty equivalent to the amount of credit wrongly taken, came into force only on 23-7-1996. Penal provisions are to be applied with reference to the law in force on the date of the wrongful act. The lower authority had also recorded that there was no allegation of wrongful utilisation of the credit, and the credit had been reversed. In these circumstances, although the taking of credit was not justified, the statutory penalty equivalent to the credit amount could not be imposed, and the penalty had to be fixed having regard to the nature of the violation and the absence of misuse of the credit.
Conclusion: The penalty equivalent to the amount of Modvat credit wrongly taken was not sustainable for the relevant period. The penalty was reduced to Rs. 5,00,000, and the appeal was otherwise rejected.
Final Conclusion: The order was modified only to the extent of reducing the penalty, while the finding that the credit had been wrongly taken was maintained.
Ratio Decidendi: Penal liability must be determined by the law in force on the date of the wrongful act, and where the credit was not utilised and was reversed, the penalty should be assessed on a proportionate basis rather than by automatic application of a later-enacted statutory penalty.