Transitional Modvat credit requires consideration of Board circulars; failure to apply them warrants remand for fresh adjudication.

Where disputed Modvat credit arose during a transitional period, the Tribunal stated that the matter could not be decided without examining Board Circular No. 76/76/94-CX, which was issued to mitigate difficulties in the switch-over of documents. Because the lower authority had noted the assessee's reliance on the circular but had not considered its contents or applied it to the facts, the decision was set aside for fresh adjudication. The relevant excise rules and notifications also had to be considered on remand. The assessee succeeded only to that limited extent, with the issue left for de novo determination.

---

---

Issues: Whether the denial of Modvat credit required fresh consideration in the light of the Board circular issued to address transitional difficulties and the relevant excise rules and notifications.

Analysis: The disputed credit arose during the transitional period when the Board had issued Circular No. 76/76/94-CX to mitigate difficulties faced by trade in the switch-over of documents. The lower authority had noted the appellant's reliance on that circular but had not examined its contents or applied it to the facts. The Tribunal held that the matter could not be properly decided without considering the relaxations and clarifications contained in the circular, especially where the period in dispute fell within the relevant time frame.

Conclusion: The matter required remand for fresh adjudication after considering Circular No. 76/76/94-CX and the relevant rules and notifications; the assessee succeeded on that limited basis.

Ratio Decidendi: Where a statutory or administrative circular issued to address transitional hardships is specifically relevant to the period and issue in dispute, failure to consider it vitiates the decision and warrants remand for de novo consideration.

---