Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit could be denied for HDPE granules on the ground that they were not specifically declared in the Rule 57G declaration, when the assessee had subsequently sought and obtained permission under Rule 57F(2) in relation to the same inputs.
Analysis: Filing of a declaration under Rule 57G is mandatory under the Modvat scheme, as it informs the department about the inputs proposed to be used in the manufacture of the specified final product. However, the assessee had also filed an application under Rule 57F(2) seeking permission to send the very same HDPE granules to a job worker for processing, and the department granted that permission. By that application, the assessee had brought the input on record before the authorities, who accepted it as an eligible input and permitted its use in relation to the notified final product. In these circumstances, the authorities had sufficient notice of the input and the declaration requirement was treated as effectively met.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to Modvat credit and the denial was not sustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the department is made aware of the relevant input through a contemporaneous application accepted under the Modvat rules, the requirement of declaration may be treated as satisfied by substantial compliance.