Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the amount spent on purchasing land in the name of the District Collector for a subsidised industrial housing scheme was a revenue expenditure deductible under section 10(2)(xv) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, or a capital expenditure.
Analysis: The expenditure was incurred for a welfare scheme connected with the assessee's business and was found to be wholly and exclusively laid out for business purposes. Although the land was purchased for the construction of workers' quarters, the title vested in the Government and no capital asset came into existence in the assessee's hands. The relevant test was whether the expenditure brought into existence an asset or advantage of enduring benefit to the business. On the facts, the arrangement was part of a subsidised scheme involving commercial expediency and a continuing obligation under the housing programme, and the assessee did not obtain an enduring capital advantage from the mere purchase of land in the assessment year.
Conclusion: The expenditure was revenue in nature and was allowable as a deduction under section 10(2)(xv) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922; the answer was against the revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: Expenditure incurred wholly and exclusively for business is deductible as revenue expenditure unless it results in the acquisition of a capital asset or an enduring advantage to the business; the substance of the arrangement and the benefit actually obtained determine its character.