Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the benefit of Notification No. 62/87-C.E. dated 1-3-1987, exempting articles of ropes falling under Tariff Item 56.08 if made without the aid of power, was available when power had been used in the manufacture of the intermediate commodity, namely ropes.
Analysis: The use of power was confined to the manufacture of the intermediate ropes, which were themselves a distinct and marketable commodity. Since the final articles of ropes were manufactured from that separately identifiable intermediate product, the power used for making the ropes could not be attributed to the manufacture of the articles of ropes for the purpose of denying the exemption. The exemption thus turned on whether power was used in the manufacture of the final exempted goods, not on power used in a prior stage for a different commodity.
Conclusion: The exemption under Notification No. 62/87-C.E. was correctly applied, and the issue was decided against the Revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an exempt final product is manufactured from a separate marketable intermediate commodity, power used in manufacturing that intermediate commodity does not disentitle the final product from an exemption conditioned on manufacture without the aid of power.