Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether buffer plungers and buffer casings supplied to Indian Railways were classifiable under Heading 86.07 or under Heading 7325.90.
Analysis: The dispute turned on the proper tariff classification of the goods. The issue had already been decided in the respondent's own earlier case, where the same items were held classifiable under Heading 86.07. Applying that ratio to the very same products involved, the classification adopted by the appellate authority under Heading 7325.90 was held to be unsustainable.
Conclusion: The goods were held classifiable under Heading 86.07 of the Central Excise Tariff, and the revenue appeal succeeded.