Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the product was classifiable as an insecticide under Heading 3808.10 or as a patent or proprietary medicine under Heading 3003.10.
Analysis: The product contained malathion only to a limited extent and also included neem, karanj oil and herbal extracts used on the hair and scalp. Its packing stated that it destroyed lice and relieved itching, showing a use in the treatment of pediculosis. The fact that it might also fall within the Insecticides Act did not exclude its treatment as a drug. A specific certification by the drugs control authority was not a necessary condition for classification as a medicament, and prescription by a physician was also not essential. On the material considered, the product answered the description of a medicament rather than a mere insecticide.
Conclusion: The product was correctly classifiable under Heading 3003.10 as a medicament, not under Heading 3808.10 as an insecticide.
Final Conclusion: The appeal failed and the classification adopted by the Revenue was sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: A product intended for treatment or prevention of a human ailment, even if it also has insecticidal properties, is classifiable as a medicament where its composition and presentation show therapeutic use.