Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit was admissible on beta naphthol when the input had already enjoyed set-off under Notification No. 432/86.
Analysis: The appeal concerned denial of Modvat credit under Rule 57A read with Notification No. 177/86. The Tribunal noted that the input had been cleared after availing set-off under Notification No. 432/86 and that, following the earlier view applied in similar matters, the duty element available for credit was only the duty actually payable after the exemption/set-off. Any credit taken beyond that amount could not be treated as credit of duty paid on inputs and was therefore inadmissible.
Conclusion: The Modvat credit was not admissible and the issue was decided against the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The denial of Modvat credit was upheld and the appeal failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Credit under the Modvat scheme is confined to the duty actually payable and paid on inputs, and where an exemption or set-off reduces that duty, credit cannot be claimed on the exempted portion.