Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee, a soap manufacturer processing vegetable non-essential oil on job-work basis into fatty acid and using the resultant product in the manufacture of soap, was entitled to money credit under Notification No. 46/89 read with Rule 57K of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.
Analysis: The notification covered vegetable oils, whether or not subjected to hydrogenation or hydrolysis, when used in the manufacture of soap, and also contemplated processing outside the soap-manufacturing factory. The assessee's activity was not a mere independent processing activity divorced from soap manufacture; the processed material was either returned to the supplier or further used in the assessee's own manufacture of soap. The existence of an intermediate product did not defeat the scheme, and the department's reliance on the exemption of fatty acid under a different notification could not deny the benefit where the final use fell within the intended scope of the money credit scheme. The interpretation adopted by the lower authorities was held to be unduly narrow and inconsistent with the object of the notification.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to the money credit benefit and the denial of credit was unsustainable.