Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported hairspring with collet was classifiable as springs under Heading 73.20 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 as a part of general use, or as parts of pressure gauges under Heading 90.26.
Analysis: The decisive question was whether the presence of a collet altered the nature of the imported item. The record showed that the goods were described as a hair spring with collet and were used in pressure gauges. The relevant tariff scheme treats springs, other than clock or watch springs, as parts of general use under Note 2(b) to Section XV, and Heading 73.20 covers springs and leaves of springs of iron or steel. The additional fitting of a collet was treated as a means of fixing or attaching the spring and not as converting a single spring into an assembly or sub-assembly. The exclusion for identifiable parts of instruments under Chapter 90 was held not to override the specific treatment of springs under Section XV.
Conclusion: The imported goods were classifiable under Heading 73.20 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 and not under Heading 90.26; the departmental classification was upheld.
Ratio Decidendi: Springs other than clock or watch springs remain parts of general use under Section XV, and the addition of fittings such as a collet does not change their tariff classification into a part of an instrument or assembly.