Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether stone crushing undertaken in crushers situated adjacent to the quarry formed part of a mine for the purpose of the exemption notification and entitled the assessee to the benefit of the notification.
Analysis: The notification exempted goods manufactured in a mine and adopted the meaning of "mine" from Section 2(j) of the Mines Act, 1952. The inclusive definition covers premises in or adjacent to and belonging to a mine on which any process ancillary to the getting, dressing or preparation for sale of minerals is carried on. On the facts, the crushers were located adjacent to the quarry and, therefore, fell within the inclusive ambit of the statutory definition. Once the crushing area was treated as part of the mine for the purposes of the notification, the exemption could not be denied merely because the activity also resulted in a new commodity.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to the benefit of the exemption notification.