Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported goods were entitled to exemption under Notification No. 232/83-Cus. despite their classification under Chapter 91, and whether the refund claim could succeed when the appellants had not challenged the classification before the lower authority.
Analysis: The goods were assessed under Chapter 91, while the exemption notification covered only goods falling under Chapters 38, 84, 85 and 90. The refund application was founded only on the plea that the appellants were an electronic industry and were entitled to the concessional benefit of the notification. It did not question the classification under Chapter 91 or seek an alternate classification before the lower authority. On that record, the classification under Chapter 91 remained unassailed, and the notification was inapplicable to such goods.
Conclusion: The appellants were not entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 232/83-Cus., and the refund claim was rightly rejected. The appeal failed.