Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal deems air-conditioning integral to SCP machine, meets customs requirements /86

        TATA ROBINS FRASER LIMITED Versus COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, CALCUTTA

        TATA ROBINS FRASER LIMITED Versus COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, CALCUTTA - 1999 (110) E.L.T. 594 (Tribunal) Issues Involved:
        1. Licence coverage relating to ITC.
        2. Availability of Notification No. 155/86-Cus. for air conditioning as an integral and essential part of the SCP machine.

        Detailed Analysis:

        Issue 1: Licence Coverage Relating to ITC
        The learned Collector ruled in favor of the appellant regarding the aspect of licence coverage. The Collector concluded, "I therefore order that the 4 REP licences produced the instant case be accepted and clubbed together for the subject consignment."

        Issue 2: Availability of Notification No. 155/86-Cus. for Air Conditioning as an Integral and Essential Part of the SCP Machine
        The learned Collector denied the benefit of Notification No. 155/86-Cus. to the appellant, reasoning that the air-conditioning equipment was not of any special design or construction to cater to any special and uniquely critical requirement. The Collector noted that the air conditioning equipment was of general type and had no special characteristics except for its high tonnage capacity. The Collector also referred to the DGTD certificate dated 11-4-1991, which described the equipment as an "Industrial Air Conditioner" and an assembled unit out of various parts manufactured by different manufacturers.

        The appellant argued that the learned Collector's reasoning was contrary to the factual position and the language and requirement of Notification No. 155/86-Cus. The notification required the importer to prove "to the satisfaction of the Assistant Collector of Customs to be so required for such setting up, assembly or manufacture..." and to furnish a certificate from an authorized authority. The appellant had fulfilled both conditions, providing a certificate from the Director General of Technical Development recommending duty-free import under Notification No. 155/86.

        The appellant further detailed the specific technical requirements and specifications of the air conditioner for the SCP machine, highlighting its unique design to safeguard hydraulic, electric, and electronic components from high ambient temperatures, contaminated atmosphere, and other harsh conditions in the coke oven area. The air conditioner was designed to maintain positive pressure, employ special filters, and handle high air velocity, among other specialized features.

        The learned DR argued that the air-conditioning equipment was of a general type and not specifically designed for the SCP machine. The DR cited the judgment of the Hon'ble High Court of Calcutta in the case of Khetawal Chemicals and Fertilizers Ltd. v. Collector of Customs, which supported the contention that machinery essential for operation may not necessarily be an integral part of another machinery or system.

        The Tribunal considered the submissions, the cassette demonstrating the SCP machine's function, and the certificate issued by the suppliers. Despite the DR's objections to the post-importation certificate, the Tribunal found no evidence to contradict the factual accuracy of the certificate, which described the air conditioner as specifically designed for the SCP machine.

        Conclusion:
        The Tribunal concluded that the air-conditioning equipment was not merely essential but required to be considered an integral part of the SCP machine. Consequently, the appeal was allowed.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found