Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the demand for reversal of proforma credit taken under Notification No. 201/79 was barred by limitation under Section 11A of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944.
Analysis: The assessee had availed proforma credit on inputs used in the manufacture of transformers under Notification No. 201/79. The input supplier later obtained refund after the inputs were held non-excisable, and the department sought to recover the credit. The Tribunal held that the facts were materially similar to the earlier decision relied upon, and that the supplier having paid duty under protest did not alter the position. Once proforma credit had been allowed, recovery of the same had to be tested under Section 11A, and the notice issued beyond the permissible period was time-barred.
Conclusion: The demand was barred by limitation and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.