Delayed excise demand on design, engineering and service charges in assessable value struck down as time-barred

Extended limitation for including design, engineering and service charges in assessable value was rejected because the Department had contemporaneous knowledge: on seeking details, the assessee promptly disclosed the relevant design and engineering charges by letter, yet the SCN was issued nearly two years later. In absence of sustainable suppression, the normal limitation alone applied, rendering the demand time-barred. The SCN's allegation of wilful suppression was further undermined by its failure to propose any penalty, indicating departmental doubt on levy. The impugned order was set aside and the appeal was allowed solely on limitation, without adjudicating merits.

---

---

Issues:
The appeal challenges the Order-in-Original dated 1st April, 1991 of Addl. Collector of Central Excise, Ahmedabad, alleging suppression of information regarding design engineering and service charges, leading to a demand of Rs. 82,985.50.

Details of the Judgment:

Issue 1: Alleged Suppression of Information
- The appellant argued that the collection of charges was disclosed in Balance Sheets submitted to the department and relevant information was promptly provided upon request.
- The Department contended that wilful suppression was evident and cited Section 11A regarding the time limit for issuing duty demands.

Issue 2: Time-Barred Show Cause Notice
- The Tribunal noted that the information regarding design and engineering charges was conveyed to the Department on 1st September, 1987, but the Show Cause Notice was issued on 6-9-1989, indicating a time-barred demand.
- Precedents such as S.D. Kemexc Industries v. C.C.E., Calcutta and M.P. Vegetable Fruits Products v. Collector of Central Excise, Raipur were cited to support the time-barred argument.
- The Tribunal highlighted cases like Mopeds India Ltd. v. C.C.E. and Kamal Plywood & Allied Industries P. Ltd. v. C.C.E., Meerut to emphasize the importance of timely issuance of Show Cause Notices.

Judgment Outcome:
- The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal solely on the point of limitation, without delving into the merits of the case that were not pleaded during the proceedings.

---