Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a job worker handling imported notified goods was covered by Chapter IVA of the Customs Act and liable for confiscation and penalty for non-compliance with the statutory declarations and restrictions.
Analysis: The goods were imported by third parties and sent to the appellants only for processing, but the statutory language of Section 11E was read as extending to persons who own, possess, control or acquire the goods, without importing a limitation that would exclude a job worker. The distinction sought to be drawn between ownership and possession was rejected. The earlier authorities relied upon were found distinguishable on facts, including cases dealing with repairers or different categories of goods. The appellants had also admitted non-compliance with the Chapter IVA procedure.
Conclusion: The job worker was held bound by Chapter IVA and the confiscation and penalty were upheld.