Modvat credit on endorsed duty-paying invoices was upheld where inputs were duty paid, received, and used in manufacture.

During the early stage of invoice-based Modvat documentation, credit was treated as admissible where the inputs were shown to be duty paid, received in the factory, and used in the manufacture of the final product. Endorsed duty-paying invoices and credit notes were accepted as adequate documentary support in the transitional period, and credit could not be denied merely because the documentation was in an endorsed or evolving form.

---

---

Issues: Whether Modvat credit was admissible on the basis of credit notes and endorsed duty-paying invoices for inputs received and used in manufacture during the initial stage of invoice-based credit documentation.

Analysis: The dispute related to a period when invoice-based documentation for Modvat credit was at an early stage of introduction. The inputs were found to be duty paid, received in the factory, and used in the manufacture of the final product. The Tribunal noted that earlier practice had involved endorsed gate passes and that prior decisions had treated similar documentary situations as sufficient support for credit in comparable circumstances. On the facts, the documentary basis for credit was accepted as adequate.

Conclusion: Modvat credit was held admissible to the appellants.

Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded and the denial of Modvat credit was set aside, with consequential relief available in accordance with law.

Ratio Decidendi: Where inputs are proved to be duty paid, received in the factory, and used in manufacture, Modvat credit cannot be denied merely because the documentation is in an endorsed or transitional form during the early stage of introduction of invoice-based credit procedures.

---