Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit on inputs received after filing of the declaration but before receipt of the dated acknowledgement could be denied, and whether the acknowledgement related back to the date of filing of the declaration.
Analysis: The declaration under Rule 57G had been filed before the inputs were received, and the credit was taken only after the acknowledgement was received. The delay in issuing acknowledgement by the departmental authority was not attributable to the assessee. A harmonious construction of the Modvat scheme required that procedural delay on the part of the department should not prejudice the assessee. The view that credit could not be denied in such circumstances was also consistent with the scheme of Rule 57H, which was relied upon as an alternative basis for entitlement.
Conclusion: The acknowledgement related back to the date of filing of the declaration, and the denial of Modvat credit was not justified. The appeal was allowed in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a declaration under the Modvat scheme is filed before receipt of inputs and the departmental acknowledgement is delayed, the acknowledgement relates back to the date of filing, and the assessee cannot be denied credit merely because of departmental delay.