Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether inputs cleared from the factory after availing Modvat credit were required to bear duty at the rate applicable as if the inputs had been manufactured in the factory, or only at the rate at which credit had originally been taken.
Analysis: The applicable rule provided that inputs on which Modvat credit had been allowed could be removed for home consumption or export under bond as if such inputs had been manufactured in the said factory. On that basis, the duty on removal had to be determined with reference to the rate applicable to the factory from which the inputs were removed. The subsequent notification relied upon by the assessee was held to be of later date and not applicable to a clearance made in November 1993. The reasoning accepted the Revenue's position that the respondents, not being a small scale unit, could not claim the concessional rate available to the suppliers.
Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee; the respondents were not entitled to clear the inputs by paying duty only equal to the credit originally taken.