Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether TC sets, DP sets, tower parts and out-door structures processed in the factory were excisable goods liable to central excise duty.
Analysis: The Tribunal relied on the earlier finding in the respondents' own case that punching, drilling holes and similar processes undertaken on TC sets and DP sets did not amount to manufacture and therefore did not attract duty. For tower parts and out-door structures, the Tribunal noted that the materials were cut to required lengths and holes were made thereon, but no new product different from the original angles, beams and channels came into existence. On that reasoning, and in light of the earlier view on structurals, the items were held not to be excisable goods.
Conclusion: The appeal was rejected and the order holding the goods as non-excisable was upheld.