Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit could be denied merely because the declaration under Rule 57G was filed after receipt of inputs and, if the delay was otherwise explained, whether the delay was condonable.
Analysis: Rule 57G(5) permitted the Assistant Commissioner to condone delay in filing the declaration for sufficient reasons, by recording reasons in writing, where the inputs were duty-paid and used in or in relation to manufacture of final products cleared on payment of duty. The conditions regarding duty-paid inputs and their use were not shown to have been violated. The denial rested only on the timing of the declaration. The delay was explained by the negligence of the Excise Clerk and the partner's ill-health, and the record showed that the declaration was filed subsequently with only a short delay in some instances and not more than about one month and three days in the longest instance.
Conclusion: The delay in filing the declaration was condonable and Modvat credit could not be denied on the sole ground of late filing of the Rule 57G declaration.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded and the denial of Modvat credit was set aside in view of sufficient cause for delayed declaration and compliance with the substantive conditions for credit.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the substantive conditions for Modvat credit are satisfied, a delayed declaration under Rule 57G should not defeat credit if sufficient cause exists for condonation under the rule.