Exemption notification interpretation allows nil-duty inputs where no credit is taken, despite wording on duty already paid.

Notification No. 208/83 was interpreted to allow exemption for finished goods made from ship-breaking scrap even where the inputs had suffered nil duty, because the phrase "duty already paid" was read in light of duty legally leviable on the inputs rather than actual payment in every case. The second proviso was treated as a restriction against taking Modvat or proforma credit, not as a separate requirement that duty must have been physically paid on the inputs. On that reading, exempted or nil-duty inputs were not disqualified where no credit had been availed, and the duty demand and penalties were set aside.

---

---

Issues: Whether finished goods manufactured from ship-breaking scrap cleared under an exemption so as to bear nil duty were entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 208/83, and whether the absence of prior actual duty payment on the inputs denied the exemption.

Analysis: Notification No. 208/83 required the final products to be made from inputs on which excise duty or additional customs duty leviable had already been paid, and also required that no credit of duty on the inputs had been taken under the Modvat or proforma credit provisions. The expression "already paid" was read in the context of the duty legally leviable on the inputs, and the fact that the inputs had suffered nil duty did not by itself exclude the exemption. The second proviso was understood only as a bar against availing credit, not as a requirement that the inputs must necessarily have suffered actual duty payment. Applying the governing interpretation of the notification, the Court accepted that exempted or nil-duty inputs were not disqualified where credit had not been taken.

Conclusion: The appellants were entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 208/83, and the duty demand and penalties were set aside.

Final Conclusion: The exemption was held available to the finished goods, so both appeals succeeded and the impugned order could not stand.

Ratio Decidendi: In an exemption notification, the phrase "duty already paid" may include inputs on which no duty was payable, provided the notification does not require actual duty payment and the corresponding credit has not been availed.

---