Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a show cause notice for confiscation and penalty under Section 124 of the Customs Act, 1962 becomes illegal or invalid merely because the seized goods are liable to be returned after expiry of the permissible period of seizure under Section 110 of the Customs Act, 1962.
Analysis: The two provisions operate in different fields. Proceedings relating to seizure and return of goods under Section 110 are independent of confiscation and penalty proceedings under Section 124. Expiry of the seizure period does not, by itself, nullify the notice for confiscation or penalty, because the latter proceedings survive even when the goods are required to be returned under Section 110.
Conclusion: The challenge to the legality of the show cause notice on this ground was rejected, the impugned appellate order was set aside, and the matter was remanded for decision on merits.