Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit on fabricated capital goods was admissible where the declaration was initially filed before the goods were taken on loan and a fresh declaration was filed within three months from the date of loan.
Analysis: The goods were manufactured in the assessee's factory for its own use, duty was paid, and the declaration under Rule 57T(4) was filed before the loan transaction. The earlier exclusion relating to loan, lease or hire purchase stood rescinded by the notifications issued on 17.06.1994. The relevant date for testing the declaration was therefore the date of loan, not the date of duty payment, and the subsequent declaration was within three months. The appellate finding that the adjudicating authority had travelled beyond the show cause notice was also left undisturbed.
Conclusion: Modvat credit was admissible and the department's appeal failed.