Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported non-woven fabric rolls were covered by OGL and could be imported without a licence, and whether the goods were correctly treated as a wiping material rather than filter media for customs classification and import policy purposes.
Analysis: The imported material was used in the manufacture of audio magnetic tapes to catch dust and foreign particles from the coated film. On its functional description, it acted as dust-catching filter media for a technical purpose and not as a wiper. The reasoning of the lower authorities that the process amounted to wiping was rejected because mere removal of dust from the surface of the tape did not amount to wiping in the relevant sense. The letters issued by DGFT and CCI & E specifically covered non-woven fabric rolls under the relevant import policy entry and indicated import under OGL subject to actual user conditions. Those competent authority clarifications were binding on customs authorities, and the customs adjudication was not supported by any expert basis sufficient to override them.
Conclusion: The imported goods were covered by OGL, no import licence was required, and the confiscation, fine, and penalty could not be sustained.