Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the land in question was a capital asset liable to capital gains tax, or agricultural land excluded from capital asset treatment.
Analysis: Capital gains under section 12B of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 arise only from transfer of a capital asset, and section 2(4A) excludes land from which the income derived is agricultural income. Since the expressions "agriculture" and "agricultural purpose" are not defined, their meaning is to be gathered from common parlance and applied with reference to the nature and character of the land, its prior use, the existence of basic agricultural operations, and surrounding circumstances. The property had coconut and other fruit-bearing trees, wells and a tank, was assessed to land revenue, and had been treated as agricultural land in the hands of the previous owner. No definite act was shown by the assessee converting it into non-agricultural land. Mere capability of being used as house sites or the assessee's intention to develop it did not by itself alter its agricultural character.
Conclusion: The land was not a capital asset and the sale proceeds were not assessable as capital gains.
Ratio Decidendi: Land continues to be agricultural land for income-tax purposes unless the evidence shows that its character has been changed by definite non-agricultural user or conversion; mere potential for building use or surrounding urban development is insufficient.