Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether freight and transportation charges incurred after clearance from the factory gate were includible in the assessable value for excise duty, and whether the duty demand and penalty could be sustained.
Analysis: The dispute turned on the principle that excise duty is a levy on manufacture, not on post-clearance profit or variations in transportation expenditure. Charges relating to transport beyond the factory gate were treated as a post-manufacturing activity and, on the facts, the show cause notice did not allege deliberate depression of price by inflating freight.
Conclusion: Freight and transportation charges incurred after clearance were not includible in the assessable value, and the duty demand and penalty could not be sustained.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded and the impugned order was set aside with consequential relief.
Ratio Decidendi: Post-clearance transportation charges are not part of the assessable value for excise duty, as excise is levied on manufacture and not on post-manufacturing expenditure.