Modvat credit for air curtains upheld where the item satisfied the scheme's essential requirements beyond capital goods classification.

Air curtains were considered for Modvat credit under the Central Excise Rules, with Rule 57Q read restrictively to cover only specified capital goods such as machines, machinery, plant, equipment, apparatus, tools or appliances used in manufacture. The reasoning applied noscitur a sociis and ejusdem generis to test whether the item fit that category. Even where an item did not qualify as capital goods under Rule 57Q, the credit claim was still to be examined under Rule 57A, because Modvat benefit could not be denied if the scheme's essential requirements were satisfied. On that basis, air curtains were treated as eligible for Modvat benefit.

---

---

Issues: Whether air curtains used in the factory were eligible for Modvat credit as capital goods under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, and whether the credit could alternatively be sustained as inputs under Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.

Analysis: The definition of capital goods under Rule 57Q was treated as restrictive and applicable to goods falling within the specified category of machines, machinery, plant, equipment, apparatus, tools or appliances used for producing or processing goods or for bringing about a change in any substance for manufacture. The terms were read cognately applying noscitur a sociis and ejusdem generis, but the Tribunal held that the real question was whether the disputed item satisfied the Modvat scheme. It further held that if an item was not covered under Rule 57Q, the matter had to be considered under Rule 57A, since the benefit of Modvat credit could not be denied where the essential requirements of the scheme were met.

Conclusion: The air curtains were held entitled to Modvat benefit, and the Department's objection that they were not capital goods under Rule 57Q did not defeat the credit claim.

---