Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a fresh show cause notice was required after the adjudicating authority accepted the assessee's classification of the goods under Chapter 39 and proceeded to examine the duty liability under Notification No. 14/92.
Analysis: Once a show cause notice had already been issued for demand of differential duty, and the adjudicating authority had accepted the classification claimed by the assessee, it was not necessary to issue a new show cause notice merely because the authority then examined the applicability of the relevant notification for determining the effective rate of duty. The question whether the goods were entitled to the benefit of any particular serial entry in Notification No. 14/92 was not finally examined by the lower appellate authority.
Conclusion: No fresh show cause notice was required on the issue of notification applicability after acceptance of classification. The matter was remanded for reconsideration of the applicability of Notification No. 14/92 to the goods after affording an opportunity of hearing.