Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether di-calcium phosphate (animal feed grade) was classifiable under Heading 2302 of the Central Excise Tariff Act and entitled to the consequential treatment claimed under Notification No. 442/86.
Analysis: The product had originally been classified by the assessee under Heading 2302, while the department had treated it as falling under Heading 3103. The dispute had already been decided in the assessee's own favour and the same view had been affirmed by the Supreme Court in the comparable matter concerning di-calcium phosphate (animal feed grade). Following that settled position, the product was treated as animal feed grade merchandise classifiable under Heading 2302. The challenge to the denial of the notification stood on the same footing as the classification dispute.
Conclusion: Di-calcium phosphate (animal feed grade) is classifiable under Heading 2302, and the assessee succeeds on that question.
Final Conclusion: The assessee's appeal was allowed and the Revenue's appeal was rejected, with the product treated as falling under Heading 2302 for excise purposes.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the classification of a product has been settled by prior adjudication and affirmed by the Supreme Court, that settled classification governs subsequent disputes concerning the same product.