Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether nickel perforated rotary screens used for printing textiles were classifiable under CET sub-heading 8442.00 and whether the benefit of Notification No. 67/91 was available for a period prior to its issuance.
Analysis: The goods had already been held in earlier Tribunal decisions to fall under CET sub-heading 8442.00. Following that settled position, the classification adopted by the lower authorities was found to be correct. Since the duty demand related to a period before the notification was issued, the exemption under Notification No. 67/91 could not be extended to the period in dispute.
Conclusion: The classification under CET sub-heading 8442.00 was upheld and the denial of the benefit of Notification No. 67/91 was sustained, against the assessee.