Tariff classification of goods under Rule 57F(2) depends on their character at clearance, while non-return may justify extended limitation.

Goods cleared under Rule 57F(2) retained their original character for tariff classification because subsequent processing at the job workers' premises did not convert them into motor vehicle parts; they were therefore classifiable as cast products at the time of clearance. In relation to limitation, where Rule 57F(2) then prescribed no time limit for return of the goods and non-return was not reported, invocation of the extended period for demand was upheld. The duty demand was remanded for revision on the basis that the goods were castings, while the extended period was sustained in principle.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the goods sent out under Rule 57F(2) remained cast products classifiable as such or were to be treated as motor vehicle parts; and (ii) whether the demand could be sustained by invoking the extended period despite removal under Rule 57F(2).

Issue (i): Whether the goods sent out under Rule 57F(2) remained cast products classifiable as such or were to be treated as motor vehicle parts.

Analysis: The bodies were found to be cast products. Subsequent processes at the job workers' premises did not alter their character for classification purposes. At the time of clearance from the factory, they had not become motor vehicle parts.

Conclusion: The goods were classifiable as cast products and not under the headings applicable to motor vehicle parts.

Issue (ii): Whether the demand could be sustained by invoking the extended period despite removal under Rule 57F(2).

Analysis: The goods were cleared under Rule 57F(2), and there was no time limit then prescribed under that rule for return of such goods. Since the non-return was not reported, the extended period was available for issuance of the demand.

Conclusion: The invocation of the extended period was upheld.

Final Conclusion: The matter was remanded for revising the duty demand on the basis that the goods were castings, while the demand was otherwise sustained in principle, including the extended period invocation.

Ratio Decidendi: Goods cleared under Rule 57F(2) retain their original character for tariff classification unless their essential nature changes, and where no time limit is prescribed for return under the rule, non-return can justify invocation of the extended period for demand.

---