Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to waiver of the requirement of pre-deposit under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944.
Analysis: The appeal raised an arguable question on valuation, including whether profit, if any, was to be added while determining the assessable value of the intermediate product under the applicable valuation rule. The appellant also showed that a substantial amount had already been deposited in the PLA account, which was sufficient to cover the demand under consideration.
Conclusion: The requirement of pre-deposit was waived and no further deposit was directed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the appeal discloses an arguable case and the amount already deposited is adequate, pre-deposit under Section 35F may be waived.