1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Tribunal rules against Revenue's appeal on 'Vetiverol Residue' classification</h1> The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi rejected the Revenue's appeal regarding the classification of 'Vetiverol Residue' under the Central Excise Tariff ... Classifiaction Issues involved: The classification of the product 'Vetiverol Residue' under sub-heading 2942.00 of the Central Excise Tariff Act or under sub-heading 3301.00 of the CETA.Summary:The appeal before the Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi involved the classification of 'Vetiverol Residue' under specific sub-headings of the Central Excise Tariff Act. The Revenue contended for classification under sub-heading 3301.00, while the lower authorities had classified it under sub-heading 2942.00.When the Respondents did not appear, the Ld. S.D.R. presented that the impugned product was obtained as a residue after distilling vetiverol oil. The Chemical Examiner classified it as a resinoid under sub-heading 3301.00. The Assistant Collector approved classification under heading 29.42, noting the presence of polymerized chemicals and waste plant materials. On appeal, the Collector (Appeals) upheld this classification, emphasizing the differences between the impugned product and terpenic-by products.The Ld. SDR argued that the impugned product should be classified under sub-heading 3301.00 based on its components and uses, as per chemical technology references. The Tribunal noted that the show cause notice only mentioned classification as 'Resinoid,' not as a terpenic by-product, which was a new point raised later and not permissible under review.Considering the lack of chemical analysis by the Examiner and the absence of new evidence from the Revenue, the Tribunal found no substantiation for classifying the product under sub-heading 3301.00. Therefore, the appeal by the Revenue was rejected, affirming the lower authorities' classification under sub-heading 2942.00 of the Central Excise Tariff Act.