Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported Photopolymer Plate Making System was correctly classifiable under Heading 90.10 and sub-heading 9010.20 of the Customs Tariff, or under Heading 84.42 as claimed by the importer.
Analysis: The goods were described as a plate-making system used for preparing printing plates by photographic principles. The Tribunal noted that the import process involved exposure of a photo negative, followed by washing, drying, and fixation for printing, and that a similar automatic plate processor had already been held classifiable under heading 9010.20. The earlier view of the appellate authority placing the goods under heading 84.42 was not accepted.
Conclusion: The imported goods were correctly classifiable under Heading 90.10 and sub-heading 9010.20 of the Customs Tariff, and not under Heading 84.42.