Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit could be denied on a gate pass endorsed thrice, and whether Board instructions limiting endorsements to two controlled the availability of credit under Rule 57G.
Analysis: The gate pass remained the same duty paying document notwithstanding successive endorsements, and the administrative instructions of the Board were treated as measures for implementation of the scheme rather than as a source of fresh statutory documents. The Tribunal also found no material to show that the goods were not in original packing, and considered the revenue risk from a third endorsement to be no greater than from earlier endorsements, provided it could be shown that the endorsing parties had not themselves taken credit.
Conclusion: Modvat credit could not be denied merely because the gate pass had been endorsed three times, and the matter required verification of whether prior endorsers had already availed credit.
Ratio Decidendi: A gate pass prescribed as a duty paying document does not lose that character merely because it is endorsed more than twice, and administrative Board instructions cannot override the statutory entitlement where duty payment and non-availment of prior credit are established.