Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether printing frames made of bolting cloth coated with sensitising chemicals were classifiable under Heading 84.42 and entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 201/87, so that the duty demand and penalty could not be sustained.
Analysis: The goods were held to be printing frames falling under Heading 84.42 on the basis of the Tribunal's earlier classification of similar products. The benefit of Notification No. 201/87 was treated as available from its operative date. For the earlier part of the period, the circular relied upon recognized coverage under Notification No. 39/90-C.E. (N.T.) issued under Section 11C of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, which extended relief for the specified past period. On that basis, the confirmed demand and the consequential penalty were held unsustainable.
Conclusion: The classification and notification benefit were accepted in favour of the assessee, and the duty demand and penalty were set aside.