Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether soapstock obtained as a by-product in the course of refining oil extracted by solvent extraction in a factory covered by the oil mill and solvent extraction industry was entitled to the exemption under Notification No. 115/75.
Analysis: The notification exempted goods manufactured in factories covered by the oil mill and solvent extraction industry, and the record showed that the appellant's unit was licensed as a single factory carrying on solvent extraction, refining, and further processing. The soapstock arose from treatment of solvent-extracted oil during refining, and the departmental trade notices supported inclusion of soapstock within the exemption. The fact that the factory also undertook downstream processes did not justify splitting the same integrated unit into separate industrial segments for denial of the benefit.
Conclusion: Soapstock was held to fall within the scope of the exemption and the denial of benefit was unsustainable.
Final Conclusion: The exemption was held applicable to soapstock produced in the appellant's integrated solvent extraction and refining unit, and the duty demand could not be sustained.