Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether reassessment of a bill of entry could be sought after assessment in order to claim the benefit of an exemption notification on the basis of an EPCG licence.
Analysis: The claim for reassessment was rejected on the premise that the goods had already been assessed and that the importer could have obtained the licence earlier. The Tribunal held that the Customs Act did not contain a general provision for reassessment, and that section 17(4) of the Customs Act, 1962 was confined to reassessment required because of discrepancies found on examination after assessment. Even so, the importer was entitled to seek the benefit of the notification after assessment, and reassessment could be ordered for that limited purpose. Reliance was placed on the recognised practice of permitting reassessment before duty payment and on the earlier High Court decision allowing reassessment in a similar situation.
Conclusion: The importer was entitled to reassessment for consideration of the EPCG licence and the consequent eligibility to the notification benefit, and the refusal to reassess was unsustainable.