Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether tax paid on concealed income under section 68 of the Finance Act, 1965, is deductible as a debt owed in computing net wealth.
Analysis: Section 68 of the Finance Act, 1965 creates a separate and distinct charge on concealed income disclosed under that section. The tax so paid is not a mere concessional quantification of liability under section 3 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 or section 4 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It is levied ad hoc on disclosed income irrespective of the assessment year, without the normal incidents of assessment under the Income-tax Act. Once tax is paid under section 68, the amount is withdrawn from assessability under the Income-tax Act and is not payment in discharge of the general income-tax liability arising under the charging provisions of the Income-tax Act.
Conclusion: Tax paid under section 68 of the Finance Act, 1965 is not deductible as a debt owed by the assessee for wealth-tax purposes. The answer is against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: Tax levied under a distinct statutory disclosure scheme, where it constitutes a separate charge on specified concealed income, is not a pre-existing income-tax liability and therefore cannot be treated as a debt owed for computing net wealth.