Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the woollen pile knitted fabric was classifiable under Tariff Heading 6001.19 or under Tariff Heading 52.05, and whether the tumbling dry process amounted to manufacture so as to deny the benefit of Notification No. 109/86-C.E.
Analysis: The fabric was treated as a pile fabric with a cotton base and a woollen pile. In the circumstances, Section Note 14 of Section XI was applied and the presence of the base fabric was accepted. The classification under Tariff Heading 6001.19 was therefore upheld on the footing that the fabric remained a pile fabric notwithstanding the cotton content.
The tumbling dry process was found not to bring into existence any new commodity. Drying of the fabric, even with the aid of power, was held not to constitute manufacture. As the fabric as a whole contained predominating cotton fibre, the benefit of Notification No. 109/86-C.E. was held applicable.
Conclusion: The classification under Tariff Heading 6001.19 was sustained, but the product was held entitled to exemption under Notification No. 109/86-C.E. because tumbling dry was not manufacture and the demand of duty could not survive.