Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the disputed parts of looms were correctly classifiable under Heading 84.83 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 by applying Note 2(a) to Section XVI, or whether they fell under Heading 84.46 as held in the impugned order by reference to Note 2(b).
Analysis: The goods in dispute were transmission shafts, gear wheels, pulleys and wheels, and other parts of looms. Their description corresponded directly with the tariff entries under Heading 84.83, namely transmission shafts, gears and gearing, and flywheels and pulleys. Since these goods were themselves included in a heading of Chapter 84 and the heading was not excluded by Note 2(a) to Section XVI, they had to be classified in their respective headings. Once Note 2(a) applied, recourse to Note 2(b) was impermissible. The reliance placed on Note 2(b) in the impugned order was therefore misplaced.
Conclusion: The goods were classifiable under Heading 84.83 and not under Heading 84.46.