Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Cenvat credit taken on inputs used exclusively in the manufacture of exempted final products was liable to be denied and recovered, notwithstanding payment of the prescribed 8% amount in respect of a manufacturer producing both dutiable and exempted goods.
Analysis: The Tribunal followed its earlier orders in the assessee's own case and reiterated that the relevant scheme treated the obligation as one attached to the class of manufacturer, not to any segregated category of inputs. Once the prescribed amount under the applicable rule was paid by a manufacturer producing both dutiable and exempted final products, the requirement corresponding to the bar on credit was treated as satisfied for the entirety of inputs used in the exempted final products. On that footing, the credit availed could not be denied merely because some inputs were used exclusively in exempted products, and the demand, penalty and interest founded on such denial could not survive.
Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of the assessee, and the demand, penalty and interest were set aside.