Modvat credit on endorsed SAIL challans remains admissible where duty-paid inputs were received and used in manufacture.

Modvat credit should not be denied merely because a SAIL challan-cum-invoice was endorsed more than once, where receipt of the inputs and their duty-paid character are established. Prior Tribunal decisions treated such SAIL documents as valid duty-paying documents and held that minor procedural irregularities do not defeat substantive credit entitlement when the goods are received and used in manufacture. The endorsed challan was treated as serving the relevant documentary purpose, and the objection based on the Board circular was not accepted.

---

---

Issues: Whether Modvat credit could be denied on the ground that the SAIL challan-cum-invoice was endorsed more than once, despite receipt of the goods and proof of duty-paid character.

Analysis: The document relied upon was a SAIL delivery challan-cum-invoice/certificate showing payment of duty. The record showed that the full consignment had been received and its use in manufacture was not in dispute. Prior Tribunal decisions treated SAIL challans as valid duty paying documents and allowed credit where there were up to two endorsements, holding that substantive Modvat benefit should not be denied for minor procedural irregularities when the duty-paid character of the inputs and their receipt were established. The objection based on the Board circular and the distinction sought on the basis of the certificate was not accepted, as no separate certificate existed in substance and the endorsed challan itself served the relevant purpose.

Conclusion: The denial of Modvat credit was not justified and the issue was answered in favour of the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and Modvat credit on the endorsed SAIL document was held admissible, with consequential relief according to law.

Ratio Decidendi: Where the receipt of inputs and their duty-paid character are established, Modvat credit cannot be denied merely because a SAIL challan-cum-invoice has been endorsed more than once, as such endorsement is a procedural irregularity and does not defeat the substantive entitlement under the Modvat scheme.

---