TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether Stock Pump, Consistency Level Box and Oscillating Shower Arrangement qualified as capital goods for Modvat credit under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. (ii) Whether Modvat credit could be taken on the strength of original invoices in the facts of the case.
Issue (i): Whether Stock Pump, Consistency Level Box and Oscillating Shower Arrangement qualified as capital goods for Modvat credit under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.
Analysis: The restrictive view that capital goods must themselves bring about an intrinsic change in the raw material was rejected. The scope of the expression "in the manufacture of goods" had already been enlarged by binding precedent to include operations and equipment used in any process in or in relation to manufacture, even if no direct transformation of the raw material is caused. On the facts, the three items were found to be essential for the efficient and uninterrupted operation of the paper board plant and were integral to the production process.
Conclusion: The three items were held to be capital goods eligible for Modvat credit, in favour of the assessee.
Issue (ii): Whether Modvat credit could be taken on the strength of original invoices in the facts of the case.
Analysis: Credit on original invoices was upheld where receipt and use of the goods were otherwise verified, and the applicable notification supported such availment. The authority relied on the distinction that the precedent cited by Revenue dealt with endorsed subsidiary gate passes and not the same factual situation involving original invoices. On the facts, the Revenue objection was found inapplicable.
Conclusion: Modvat credit on the strength of original invoices was held admissible, in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order allowing Modvat credit on both counts was sustained and the Revenue appeal failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Goods used as essential equipment in a manufacturing plant qualify as capital goods when they are used in or in relation to manufacture, even if they do not themselves effect an intrinsic change in the raw material, and credit may be allowed on original invoices where receipt and use are verified and the governing notification permits it.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
