Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether accumulated Modvat credit earned on inputs used in exported final products could be utilised, or refunded in cash if unutilised, for payment of duty on similar final products cleared for home consumption.
Analysis: The Tribunal held that Rule 57F(3) permits utilisation of credit in respect of similar final products cleared for home consumption where the inputs were used in final products cleared for export under bond. The expression "similar" was read broadly and not as meaning identical. The Tribunal found that export-related accumulation of credit stands on a special footing and that there is no requirement of strict one-to-one correlation so long as the products answer to the same description and fall under the same tariff heading. The earlier order in the appellants' own case and the decision recognising cash refund of unutilised credit supported this view.
Conclusion: The demand was unsustainable and the impugned order was liable to be set aside. The appeals were allowed with consequential relief.