Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether rent-free residential accommodation provided to a financial adviser was assessable under section 7 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 as salary-related income.
Analysis: Section 7 applies only where the benefit is salary, wages, or a perquisite or profit in lieu of or in addition to salary, and that presupposes an employer-employee relationship between the payer and the payee. A director is not, by that reason alone, an employee. The assessee was appointed as financial adviser by board resolution, but the resolution contained no terms of engagement showing contractual employment. There was no finding that the assessee worked under the company's control in the manner of a servant, and the nature of his functions was not established. On those facts, the requisite master-servant relationship was not shown.
Conclusion: Section 7 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 did not apply, and the addition on account of rent-free accommodation was rightly deleted in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The reference was answered for the assessee on the footing that the benefit was not taxable as salary-related income in the absence of an employer-employee relationship.
Ratio Decidendi: A perquisite is taxable under the salary head only if it is received in the course of an employer-employee relationship, which must be established by evidence of contractual engagement and the employer's right of control over the work done.